NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 7289.7x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- 9.5x more pipelines: 4864 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 350x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 5.0 GB/s
- 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 3337
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 515
- 11.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 9306
- 9.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 34.239
- 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 639.427
- 15.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 2.341
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 32
- 21.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 69.814
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 4498
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 4498
- 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1050
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 18 February 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 3337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 9306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1050 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 3337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 9306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1050 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
Code name | GA104 | GM107 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 18 February 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $119 |
Place in performance rating | 104 | 724 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $150.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |