NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 38% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1020 MHz
- Environ 53% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 34.72 GTexel / s
- 9.5x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 512
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 1 GB
- 350x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 5.0 GB/s
- 6.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 3337
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 515
- 11.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 9306
- 9.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 34.239
- 7.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 639.427
- 15.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 2.341
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 32
- 21.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 69.814
- 6.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 4498
- 6.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 4498
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1050
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1020 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4864 versus 512 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1050 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 200 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1050 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GA104 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 18 February 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $119 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 724 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $150.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4864 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation
