NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 6 Jahr(e) 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 38% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Etwa 53% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 7289.7x mehr Texturfüllrate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- 9.5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 4864 vs 512
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 350x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 5.0 GB/s
- 6.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 3337
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 515
- 11.7x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 9306
- 9.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 34.239
- 7.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 639.427
- 15.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 2.341
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 32
- 21.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 69.814
- 6.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 4498
- 6.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 4498
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1050
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 18 February 2014 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 vs 512 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 3337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 9306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1050 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 3.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 55 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 3337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 9306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1050 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Maxwell |
Codename | GA104 | GM107 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 18 February 2014 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $119 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 724 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $150.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 55 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 512 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,111 gflops | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 95 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | None |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5.0 GB/s |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |