NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 935
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 23659
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 23659
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 20 September 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 vs 935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21786 vs 20555
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 vs 107152
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 vs 311.869
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 vs 4657.322
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.133 vs 35.311
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.697 vs 125
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1477.456
- Around 25% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14612 vs 11652
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21786 vs 20555 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 vs 107152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 vs 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 vs 4657.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 vs 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 vs 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 vs 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14612 vs 11652 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20555 | 21786 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107152 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.869 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11652 | 14612 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU102 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 102 | 83 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |