NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 versus 935
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 23659
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 23659
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 versus 935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21784 versus 20549
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 versus 107110
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 311.869
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 4657.322
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.133 versus 35.311
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.697 versus 125
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1477.456
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14606 versus 11652
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21784 versus 20549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 versus 107110 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 4657.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 versus 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 versus 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14606 versus 11652 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20549 | 21784 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107110 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.869 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11652 | 14606 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 101 | 83 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |