NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 1029 MHz
• Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• 11067.9x more texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
• 9.3x more pipelines: 3584 vs 384
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
• 15.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 1096
• 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 151
• 15.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 5771
• 13.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 22.848
• 24.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 162.594
• 23.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 1.237
• 8.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 21.15
• 12.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 95.545
• 10.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 2085
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2736
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3191
• 10.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 2085
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2736
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3191
• 3.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 vs 503

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M

• 5.2x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 170 Watt
• Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 2002 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	17107 1096
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	971 151
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	88251 5771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	299.369 22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4021.382 162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.778 1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	188.944 21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1152.664 95.545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22495 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22495 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3191
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 503

Compare specifications (specs)