NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 26% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 879
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 293.508
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 158.103
- 1255x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8785 vs 7
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 2 July 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 158.103 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8785 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- 7.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18218 vs 17107
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99291 vs 88251
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 4021.382
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 28.778
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 1152.664
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 22495
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 22495
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18218 vs 17107 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99291 vs 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 vs 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 vs 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 vs 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 18218 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 879 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 99291 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8785 | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU104 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 2 July 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 138 | 141 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 13.6 B |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 650 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |