NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2560
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 26% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 215 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 versus 879
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 versus 293.508
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 versus 158.103
- 1255x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8785 versus 7
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 2 July 2019 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz versus 1770 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 2560 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 versus 879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 versus 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 versus 158.103 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8785 versus 7 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1320 MHz
- 7.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18218 versus 17107
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99291 versus 88251
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 4021.382
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 28.778
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1152.664
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 22495
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 22495
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1320 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18218 versus 17107 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99291 versus 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 18218 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 879 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 99291 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8785 | 7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA106 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 2 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 138 | 141 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 13.6 B |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | 650 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 360 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |