NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15361 vs 6514
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 643 vs 336
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 92696 vs 39228
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 24877 vs 9780
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 11471 vs 2168
• 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13334 vs 1982
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 24877 vs 9780
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 11471 vs 2168
• 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13334 vs 1982

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 780 MHz
• 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 2380

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15361 6514
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	643 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	92696 39228
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24877 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11471 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13334 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24877 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11471 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13334 1982
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2380 3172

Compare specifications (specs)