NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 639.4x more texture fill rate: 206.4 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3584
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 235 Watt
• Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1430 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15361 vs 15149
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 92696 vs 88910
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 vs 355.937
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.308 vs 25.191
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.818 vs 144.928
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1410.887 vs 1056.078
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 24877 vs 16640
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 24877 vs 16640

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100

• Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1304 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1442 MHz vs 1290 MHz
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 836 vs 643
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 vs 4619.617
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 11471
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 13334
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 11471
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 13334

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15361 15149
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	643 836
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	92696 88910
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	449.647 355.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4619.617 4858.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.308 25.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	181.818 144.928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1410.887 1056.078
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24877 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11471 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13334 22133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24877 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11471 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13334 22133

Compare specifications (specs)