NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 5120
• Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 290 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 vs 17213
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 vs 3714
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 vs 3350
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 vs 17213
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 vs 3714
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 vs 3350

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1575 MHz
• Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1770 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26728 vs 23473
• Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 166004 vs 137711
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 342.287
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 42.369
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 146.214
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1807.647
• 6.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 21090 vs 3476

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	23473 26728
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1047 1048
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	137711 166004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	342.287 543.753
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.369 51.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	146.214 320.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1807.647 2566.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31420 17213
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8897 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8004 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31420 17213
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8897 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8004 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3476 21090

Compare specifications (specs)