NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- 2.1x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23411 vs 18750
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 908
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137664 vs 105219
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 342.287 vs 326.494
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 vs 31.684
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 vs 1506.874
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 vs 25500
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 vs 6966
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 vs 6293
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 vs 25500
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 vs 6966
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 vs 6293
- Around 99% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3478 vs 1752
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 20 September 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 2944 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 vs 18750 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 908 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 vs 105219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 vs 326.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 vs 31.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 vs 1506.874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 vs 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 vs 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 vs 6293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 vs 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 vs 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 vs 6293 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 vs 1752 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 290 Watt
- 11.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 vs 146.214
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 290 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 vs 146.214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 | 18750 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 908 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 | 105219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 326.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 31.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 159.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 1506.874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 6293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 6293 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 | 1752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 31 May 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 66 | 105 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $749.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 2944 |
| Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
