NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1710 MHz
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 2944
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 23411 versus 18750
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 versus 908
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137664 versus 105219
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 342.287 versus 326.494
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 versus 31.684
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 versus 1506.874
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 versus 25500
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 versus 6966
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 versus 6293
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 versus 25500
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 versus 6966
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 versus 6293
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3478 versus 1752
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 20 September 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1710 MHz |
| Pipelines | 6144 versus 2944 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 versus 18750 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 versus 908 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 versus 105219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 versus 326.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 versus 31.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 versus 1506.874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 versus 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 versus 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 versus 6293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 versus 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 versus 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 versus 6293 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 versus 1752 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 35% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 290 Watt
- 11.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 versus 146.214
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 290 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 versus 146.214 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 | 18750 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 908 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 | 105219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 326.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 31.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 159.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 1506.874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 6293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 6293 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 | 1752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 66 | 105 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 2944 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 169.9 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 339.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 608.3 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
