NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16450 vs 13527
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 96301 vs 69404
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26045 vs 13044
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26045 vs 13044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 13 August 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16450 vs 13527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 96301 vs 69404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 801 vs 641
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3719
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3359
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3719
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 801 vs 641 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16450 | 13527 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 801 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 96301 | 69404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 30936 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12007 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 125 | 128 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 239.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | |
Pixel fill rate | 119.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 239.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |