NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16450 vs 13527
  • Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 96301 vs 69404
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26045 vs 13044
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26045 vs 13044
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 Jan 2021 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 16450 vs 13527
Geekbench - OpenCL 96301 vs 69404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26045 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26045 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1245 MHz
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
  • Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 801 vs 641
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3719
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3359
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3719
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3359
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1245 MHz
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 801 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
16450
13527
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
641
801
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
96301
69404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26045
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26045
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
30936
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark 16450 13527
PassMark - G2D Mark 641 801
Geekbench - OpenCL 96301 69404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26045 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26045 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 30936
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 12007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Ampere GCN 5.0
Code name GA104 Vega 10
Launch date 12 Jan 2021 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 125 128
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1245 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 780 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 239.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.30 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 15.30 TFLOPS
Pipelines 6144
Pixel fill rate 119.5 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 239.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent 4x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
G-SYNC support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 384.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6

Technologies

GPU Boost
VR Ready