NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16477 vs 13410
Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98850 vs 69525
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26045 vs 13044
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26045 vs 13044

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 Jan 2021 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	16477 vs 13410
Geekbench - OpenCL	98850 vs 69525
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	26045 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	26045 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz
Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1245 MHz
Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 vs 642
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3719
9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3359
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3719
9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3359

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 780 MHz
Boost clock speed	1530 MHz vs 1245 MHz
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	799 vs 642
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7164 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	30936 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7164 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	30936 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

16477

13410

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

642

799

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

98850

69525

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26045

13044

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

7164

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

30936

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26045

13044

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

7164

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

30936

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark	16477	13410
PassMark - G2D Mark	642	799
Geekbench - OpenCL	98850	69525
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	26045	13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	26045	13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	30936
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	12007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 5.0
Code name	GA104	Vega 10
Launch date	12 Jan 2021	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	124	127
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$999
Value for money (0-100)		13.37
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz	1530 MHz
Core clock speed	780 MHz	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	239.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.30 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	15.30 TFLOPS
Pipelines	6144
Pixel fill rate	119.5 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	239.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	230 Watt
Transistor count	17400 million	12,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	4x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
G-SYNC support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective	2000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6
Technologies
GPU Boost
VR Ready