NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3576.8x more texture fill rate: 239.0 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 6144 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16407 vs 6332
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 103038 vs 20732
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26045 vs 8496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26045 vs 8496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336
- 8.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2644 vs 305
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 239.0 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16407 vs 6332 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 103038 vs 20732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 vs 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 vs 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2644 vs 305 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 641
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 641 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16407 | 6332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 650 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 103038 | 20732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2644 | 305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA104 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 25 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 137 | 487 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 239.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 119.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 239.0 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 3,300 million |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 7 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
