NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 5120
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 vs 17213
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 vs 3714
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 vs 3350
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 vs 17213
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 vs 3714
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 371.785
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 31.212
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 190.723
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1422.602
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 371.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 31.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 190.723 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 1422.602 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 543.753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 51.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 320.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 2566.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3350 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 161035 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 93 | 70 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 80 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 50 mm (2 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |