NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 5120
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 versus 17213
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 versus 3714
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 versus 3350
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 versus 17213
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 versus 3714
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 versus 3350
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 28 Oct 2020 |
| Pipelines | 6144 versus 5120 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 versus 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 versus 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Environ 64% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 46% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 versus 371.785
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 versus 31.212
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 190.723
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 1422.602
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 versus 371.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 versus 31.212 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 190.723 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 1422.602 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 543.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 51.155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 320.733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 2566.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3350 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26855 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 161035 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GA104 | Navi 21 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 93 | 70 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 26800 million |
| Unités de Compute | 80 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 50 mm (2 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Facteur de forme | Triple-slot | |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
