NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1110 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 vs 21578
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 vs 3652
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 vs 3290
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 vs 21578
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 vs 3652
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 371.785
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3552.807
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 31.212
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 190.723
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1422.602

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	371.785 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3552.807 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.212 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	190.723 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1422.602 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26295 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9367 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8604 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26295 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9367 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8604 3290

Compare specifications (specs)