NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- 1268.2x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 5120
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 131696
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 19081
- 59.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 62
- 58.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 57
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 19081
- 59.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 62
- 58.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 57
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 27 March 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 5120 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 vs 131696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 19081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 19081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 24 GB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 24 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | 131696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 19081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 19081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 57 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
Code name | GA102 | GV100 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 27 March 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Place in performance rating | 46 | 264 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1752 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | HBM2 |