NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1607 MHz
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 2535 MHz vs 1733 MHz
- 1243.4x more texture fill rate: 344.8 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- Around 70% higher pipelines: 4352 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 165 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 225x more memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1068 vs 887
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22758 vs 15578
- Around 86% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2907 vs 1560
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 May 2023 vs 27 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1607 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz vs 1733 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 344.8 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4352 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1068 vs 887 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22758 vs 15578 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2907 vs 1560 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1068 | 887 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22758 | 15578 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2907 | 1560 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
Code name | AD106 | GP104 |
Launch date | 18 May 2023 | 27 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 48 | 281 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 4352 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 121.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 344.8 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 22900 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 240 mm, 9.4 inches | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 500 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 8-pin |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | 2-slot |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 10 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |