NVIDIA A30 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A30 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A30
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 730.5x more texture fill rate: 322.6 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 165 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 21 June 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 322.6 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1246 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3584
- Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 1758 MHz vs 1215 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1246 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3584 |
Memory clock speed | 1758 MHz vs 1215 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A30
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe
Name | NVIDIA A30 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 127071 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA A30 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
Code name | GA100 | GV100 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 21 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 99 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1246 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 5.161 TFLOPS (1:2) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.32 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.32 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 138.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 322.6 GTexel/s | 441.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 54200 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 933.1 GB/s | 900.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 3072 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1215 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective | 1758 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2e | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |