NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB vs AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 1402.5x more texture fill rate: 224.4 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 49% lower typical power consumption: 184 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1000 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 850 vs 791
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 8876
- 8.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8026 vs 955
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Dec 2021 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 224.4 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 184 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 850 vs 791 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 8876 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8026 vs 955 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390
- Around 18% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2176
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2176 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 850 | 791 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 8876 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8026 | 955 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43778 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Grenada |
Launch date | 7 Dec 2021 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 54 | 312 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 224.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.36 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.181 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 79.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.4 GTexel/s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 184 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 6,200 million |
Compute units | 40 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,120 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 512 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |