NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 877.2x more texture fill rate: 224.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 14696
- 5.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8026 vs 1471
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Dec 2021 vs 2 November 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 224.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 14696 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8026 vs 1471 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1470 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 12% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2176
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 184 Watt
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 850
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1470 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 2176 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 184 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 850 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 850 | 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 14696 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8026 | 1471 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55424 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU106 | GP104 |
Launch date | 7 Dec 2021 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 54 | 250 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 224.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.36 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.181 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 79.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.4 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 184 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |