NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1552 MHz vs 941 MHz
- Around 84% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 967 MHz
- 4596x more texture fill rate: 142.2 GTexel/s vs 30.94 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 2560 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 918 vs 244
- 9.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12598 vs 1330
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 9 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1552 MHz vs 941 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 967 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 142.2 GTexel/s vs 30.94 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 vs 244 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12598 vs 1330 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 | 244 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12598 | 1330 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
Code name | GA106 | GK107 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 9 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 52 | 1141 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 967 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1552 MHz | 941 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 142.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.098 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.098 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.86 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 142.2 GTexel/s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 API |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 4012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |