NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 56x more texture fill rate: 126.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 954 vs 765
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11971 vs 8164
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60541 vs 56152
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.741 vs 141.474
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.08 vs 13.132
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 806.848 vs 799.933
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 26 April 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 954 vs 765 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11971 vs 8164 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60541 vs 56152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 vs 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 vs 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 vs 799.933 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2304
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 vs 2522.737
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.973 vs 87.152
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 2304 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 vs 2522.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 vs 87.152 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 954 | 765 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11971 | 8164 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60541 | 56152 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6262 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 | 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2522.737 | 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 | 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.152 | 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Capsaicin |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 26 April 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 197 | 200 |
| Design | reference | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
| Price now | $849 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2x 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | 8,900 million |
| Compute units | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 277 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
NVIDIAGRID M6-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro Duo
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
