NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1475 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 952 vs 827
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 23 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 952 vs 827 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
- 3x more texture fill rate: 377.6 GTexel/s vs 126.4 GTexel/s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13709 vs 11931
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75438 vs 60490
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s vs 126.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13709 vs 11931 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75438 vs 60490 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 952 | 827 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11931 | 13709 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60490 | 75438 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6262 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.389 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2525.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.12 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.917 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 808.367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 23 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 197 | 199 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1475 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 755.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | 24.17 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | 12.08 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 94.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 377.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 12500 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |