NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon HD 6550M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q and AMD Radeon HD 6550M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 10700x more texture fill rate: 128.4 GTexel/s vs 12 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 2560 vs 400
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 40 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
| Launch date | 2023 vs 26 November 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 128.4 GTexel/s vs 12 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 400 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6550M
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 26 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 26 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 6550M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | AD107 | Capilano |
| Launch date | 2023 | 26 November 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1605 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.218 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.218 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 400 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.36 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.4 GTexel/s | 12 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 26 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 627 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050
