NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 128.4 GTexel/s vs 79.68 GTexel/s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
| Launch date | 2023 vs 17 Dec 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 128.4 GTexel/s vs 79.68 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 85 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 274 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD107 | GA107 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 17 Dec 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 348 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1245 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.218 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.218 TFLOPS | 5.100 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.36 GPixel/s | 39.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 128.4 GTexel/s | 79.68 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 30 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
| Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
| Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050
