NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 713 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1086 MHz
- 1154.6x more texture fill rate: 140.4 GTexel/s vs 121.6 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 5489
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74538 vs 25596
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 18 November 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 713 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1086 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s vs 121.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 vs 5489 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 vs 25596 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 630
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 vs 630 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | 772 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 | 5489 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 | 25596 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | AD107 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 2023 | 18 November 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 167 | 477 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1086 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 713 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | 121.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |