NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 12712
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74538 vs 62641
- Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1788 vs 1278
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 29 Oct 2019 |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1408 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 vs 12712 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 vs 62641 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 vs 1278 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1755 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 804 vs 630
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1755 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 vs 630 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | 804 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 | 12712 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 | 62641 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 | 1278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
Code name | AD107 | TU116 |
Launch date | 2023 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 167 | 223 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 125 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |