NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 578
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14436 vs 13828
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 578 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14436 vs 13828 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 207.4 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 93962 vs 73914
- Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8567 vs 8225
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 93962 vs 73914 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8567 vs 8225 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 578 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14436 | 13828 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73914 | 93962 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8225 | 8567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD107 | TU104B |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 138 | 139 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1080 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | 6.636 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | 207.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
