NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
| Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1755 MHz
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 626
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 14436
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 73914
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8783 vs 8225
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1755 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 626 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 14436 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 73914 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8783 vs 8225 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 971 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14436 | 17107 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73914 | 88251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8225 | 8783 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD107 | GA106 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 138 | 136 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1320 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
| Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
