NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon R9 350
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 and AMD Radeon R9 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
| Launch date | 2023 vs 12 June 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 350
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | AMD Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | AMD Radeon R9 350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Tobago |
| Code name | AD106 | |
| Launch date | 2023 | 12 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 585 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS | 1421 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 84.48 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 95 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
