NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon RX 470D
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 and AMD Radeon RX 470D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 926 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- 1563.3x more texture fill rate: 211.2 GTexel/s vs 135.1 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
| Launch date | 2023 vs 21 October 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 926 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s vs 135.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470D
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | AMD Radeon RX 470D | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | AD106 | Ellesmere |
| Launch date | 2023 | 21 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1206 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 84.48 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s | 135.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 4,322 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 211.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 6600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
