NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 2.9x more boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 4866.4x more texture fill rate: 211.2 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 2560 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
| Launch date | 2023 vs 10 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Code name | AD106 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 10 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 853 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 84.48 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
