NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1392 MHz
2714.8x more texture fill rate: 181.4 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 3072 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s
Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 732 vs 650
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17566 vs 6332
4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89106 vs 20732
7.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2255 vs 305

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2023 vs 25 October 2016
Core clock speed	1545 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Boost clock speed	1890 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Texture fill rate	181.4 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3072 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	732 vs 650
PassMark - G3D Mark	17566 vs 6332
Geekbench - OpenCL	89106 vs 20732
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2255 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 115 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

732

650

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

17566

6332

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

89106

20732

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2255

305

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark	732	650
PassMark - G3D Mark	17566	6332
Geekbench - OpenCL	89106	20732
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2255	305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3336

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Code name	AD107	GP107
Launch date	2023	25 October 2016
Place in performance rating	123	487
Launch price (MSRP)		$139
Price now		$159.99
Type		Desktop
Value for money (0-100)		46.07
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1890 MHz	1392 MHz
Core clock speed	1545 MHz	1392 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	181.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.61 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	11.61 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3072	768
Pixel fill rate	60.48 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	181.4 GTexel/s	66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt	75 Watt
CUDA cores		768
Floating-point performance		2,138 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Transistor count		3,300 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		145 mm
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective	7 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready