NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and AMD Radeon RX 6800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 2321 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 2581 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 101689 vs 87706
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1087 vs 545
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19789 vs 13338
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 2321 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 2581 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101689 vs 87706 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1087 vs 545 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19789 vs 13338 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11186 vs 10613
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11186 vs 10613 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | AMD Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101689 | 87706 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1087 | 545 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19789 | 13338 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10613 | 11186 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | AMD Radeon RX 6800M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD106 | Navi 22 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 72 | 80 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
AMDRadeon Pro V520
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIARTX A5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600 XT
