NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 8.4x more core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- 4x more texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
- 5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 10 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- 7.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 vs 14238
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 311
- 10x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 vs 1972
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 31 Oct 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 10 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 vs 14238 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 vs 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 vs 1972 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | 14238 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 1972 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.1 |
Code name | AD106 | DG1 |
Launch date | 2023 | 31 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 75 | 523 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3840 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | 39.60 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | 79.20 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 25 Watt |
Compute units | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 68.26 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR4X |