NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- Around 30% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 804
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 vs 15014
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2944 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 vs 804 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 vs 15014 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
- 4.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10073 vs 2302
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10073 vs 2302 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 804 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 15014 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | 10073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
Code name | AD106 | TU104 |
Launch date | 2023 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 75 | 95 |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |