NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 211.2 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
| Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s vs 211.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2560 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 200 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Code name | AD106 | AD106 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | 75 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 2640 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 2505 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | 13.52 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | 84.48 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | 211.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 150 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

