NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 16398.1x more texture fill rate: 177.1 GTexel/s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
- 64x more pipelines: 4608 vs 72
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 2023 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 177.1 GTexel/s vs 10.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 72 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 85 Watt
Core clock speed | 1080 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 29 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7386 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2120 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2120 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | AD106 | GT215 |
Launch date | 2023 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1560 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1230 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 177.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.34 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.34 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4608 | 72 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 177.1 GTexel/s | 10.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 28 Watt |
CUDA cores | 72 | |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 233 | |
Transistor count | 727 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |