NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 626.4 GTexel/s vs 480.2 GTexel/s
- Around 30% higher pipelines: 7680 vs 5888
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1198 vs 1166
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31655 vs 26959
- Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5024 vs 3854
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205069 vs 168049
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 939.363 vs 417.133
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 67.426 vs 55.476
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 348.259 vs 245.639
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2895.895 vs 2459.317
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s vs 480.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 7680 vs 5888 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 vs 1166 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 vs 26959 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5024 vs 3854 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 vs 168049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 vs 417.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 vs 55.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 vs 245.639 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 vs 2459.317 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Launch date | 2023 vs 3 Jan 2023 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 | 1166 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 | 26959 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5024 | 3854 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 | 168049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 | 417.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 | 55.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 | 245.639 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 | 2459.317 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD104 | AD104 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 8 | 35 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 2610 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 2310 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 626.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 480.2 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) | 30.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS | 30.74 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 7680 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.8 GPixel/s | 167.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s | 480.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 285 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 35800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | 61 mm, 2.4 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 336 mm, 13.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 140 mm, 5.5 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 504.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |