NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 761.5 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 9728 vs 3840
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1236 vs 1081
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 34500 vs 19722
- 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6567 vs 2302
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 240557 vs 101650
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 722.769 vs 311.253
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 72.795 vs 33.932
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 272.641 vs 169.697
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 761.5 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 9728 vs 3840 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1236 vs 1081 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 34500 vs 19722 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6567 vs 2302 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 240557 vs 101650 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 722.769 vs 311.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 72.795 vs 33.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 272.641 vs 169.697 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 2205 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 2505 MHz
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 61% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective
Launch date | 2023 vs 20 Sep 2022 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 2205 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 2505 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1236 | 1081 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 34500 | 19722 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6567 | 2302 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 240557 | 101650 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 722.769 | 311.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 72.795 | 33.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 272.641 | 169.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD103 | AD106 |
Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 14 | 75 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 2640 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2205 MHz | 2505 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 761.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 48.74 TFLOPS | 20.28 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 9728 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 280.6 GPixel/s | 126.7 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 761.5 GTexel/s | 316.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 45900 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 310 mm, 12.2 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 716.8 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |