NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 2205 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 761.5 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 9728 vs 4608
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1236 vs 759
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 34500 vs 19586
- 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6567 vs 2701
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 240557 vs 109087
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 722.769 vs 319.688
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 72.795 vs 36.174
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 272.641 vs 218.946
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2205 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 761.5 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 9728 vs 4608 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1236 vs 759 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 34500 vs 19586 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6567 vs 2701 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 240557 vs 109087 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 722.769 vs 319.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 72.795 vs 36.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 272.641 vs 218.946 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective
Launch date | 2023 vs 20 Sep 2022 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1236 | 759 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 34500 | 19586 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6567 | 2701 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 240557 | 109087 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 722.769 | 319.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 72.795 | 36.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 272.641 | 218.946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD103 | AD106 |
Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 14 | 80 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2205 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 761.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 48.74 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 9728 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 280.6 GPixel/s | 81.36 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 761.5 GTexel/s | 244.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 45900 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | IGP |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 310 mm, 12.2 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |
Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 716.8 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |