NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 761.5 GTexel/s vs 626.4 GTexel/s
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 9728 vs 7680
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1236 vs 1198
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 34500 vs 31655
- Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6567 vs 5024
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 240557 vs 205069
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 72.795 vs 67.426
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 761.5 GTexel/s vs 626.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 9728 vs 7680 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1236 vs 1198 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 34500 vs 31655 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6567 vs 5024 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 240557 vs 205069 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 72.795 vs 67.426 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 2205 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 2505 MHz
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 285 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 939.363 vs 722.769
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 348.259 vs 272.641
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 20 Sep 2022 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 2205 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 2505 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt vs 320 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 vs 722.769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 vs 272.641 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1236 | 1198 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 34500 | 31655 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6567 | 5024 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 240557 | 205069 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 722.769 | 939.363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 72.795 | 67.426 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 272.641 | 348.259 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Code name | AD103 | AD104 |
| Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 | 3 Jan 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | 14 | 8 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 2610 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2205 MHz | 2310 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 761.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | 626.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 48.74 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 9728 | 7680 |
| Pixel fill rate | 280.6 GPixel/s | 208.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 761.5 GTexel/s | 626.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 285 Watt |
| Transistor count | 45900 million | 35800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
| Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | 42 mm, 1.7 inches |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 310 mm, 12.2 inches | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 16-pin |
| Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 716.8 GB/s | 504.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7800
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 vs
NVIDIARTX 4500 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 D
