NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs NVIDIA NX-SoC
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and NVIDIA NX-SoC videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 384 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 768 MHz
- 41928.4x more texture fill rate: 515.3 GTexel/s vs 12.29 GTexel / s
- 38x more pipelines: 9728 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 20 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date | 2023 vs 17 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1335 MHz vs 384 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 768 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s vs 12.29 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 9728 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 20 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NX-SoC
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA NX-SoC
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA NX-SoC |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4911 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 180351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA NX-SoC | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | AD103 | GM20B |
Launch date | 2023 | 17 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 39 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 768 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1335 MHz | 384 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 20 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 9728 | 256 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | 12.29 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 45900 million | |
Floating-point performance | 393.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR4 |