NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
2x more core clock speed: 2235 MHz vs 1093 MHz
29.5x more texture fill rate: 1,290 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
25.6x more pipelines: 16384 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1297 vs 312
11.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 38287 vs 3217
11x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 582.642 vs 52.821
27.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 98.472 vs 3.631
3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.756 vs 48.966
18.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2968.159 vs 163.204
30x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 317791 vs 10582

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	20 Sep 2022 vs 11 January 2017
Core clock speed	2235 MHz vs 1093 MHz
Texture fill rate	1,290 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	16384 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1297 vs 312
PassMark - G3D Mark	38287 vs 3217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	582.642 vs 52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	98.472 vs 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	178.756 vs 48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2968.159 vs 163.204
Geekbench - OpenCL	317791 vs 10582

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

10x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 450 Watt
3.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 450 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1297

312

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

38287

3217

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

582.642

52.821

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

98.472

3.631

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

178.756

48.966

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2968.159

163.204

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

317791

10582

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark	1297	312
PassMark - G3D Mark	38287	3217
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	9223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	582.642	52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	98.472	3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	178.756	48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2968.159	163.204
Geekbench - OpenCL	317791	10582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	0	793.297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3359

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Maxwell
Code name	AD102	GM107
Launch date	20 Sep 2022	11 January 2017
Place in performance rating	13	759
Type		Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2520 MHz
Core clock speed	2235 MHz	1093 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1,290 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	82.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	82.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines	16384	640
Pixel fill rate	443.5 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	1,290 GTexel/s	43.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	450 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	76300 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,399 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Triple-slot
Height	61 mm, 2.4 inches
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	304 mm, 12 inches
Recommended system power (PSU)	850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin
Width	137 mm, 5.4 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	1,008 GB/s	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR5