NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 55% higher core clock speed: 2235 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 2520 MHz vs 1770 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1297 vs 785
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 38287 vs 18544
2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9223 vs 3503
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 582.642 vs 488.989
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 98.472 vs 41.461
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.756 vs 153.677
Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2968.159 vs 1534.582
4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 317791 vs 74179

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	20 Sep 2022 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed	2235 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	2520 MHz vs 1770 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1297 vs 785
PassMark - G3D Mark	38287 vs 18544
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	9223 vs 3503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	582.642 vs 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	98.472 vs 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	178.756 vs 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2968.159 vs 1534.582
Geekbench - OpenCL	317791 vs 74179

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 450 Watt
10.7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt vs 450 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1297

785

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

38287

18544

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

9223

3503

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

582.642

488.989

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

98.472

41.461

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

178.756

153.677

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2968.159

1534.582

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

317791

74179

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G2D Mark	1297	785
PassMark - G3D Mark	38287	18544
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	9223	3503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	582.642	488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	98.472	41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	178.756	153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2968.159	1534.582
Geekbench - OpenCL	317791	74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	0	5451.006
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3357

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Code name	AD102	TU102
Launch date	20 Sep 2022	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	13	124
Launch price (MSRP)		$6,299
Type		Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2520 MHz	1770 MHz
Core clock speed	2235 MHz	1440 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1,290 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	82.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	82.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines	16384
Pixel fill rate	443.5 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	1,290 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	450 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	76300 million	18,600 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Triple-slot
Height	61 mm, 2.4 inches
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	304 mm, 12 inches	267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	2x 8-pin
Width	137 mm, 5.4 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB
Memory bandwidth	1,008 GB/s
Memory bus width	384 bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6X