NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 440.4x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
- Around 30% higher pipelines: 3328 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 150x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 72849 vs 55413
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.704 vs 150.103
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3385.355 vs 2036.763
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.913 vs 14.035
- 8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 240.964 vs 27.417
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1030.098 vs 819.934
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3328 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72849 vs 55413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 vs 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3385.355 vs 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.913 vs 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 vs 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1030.098 vs 819.934 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7241 vs 5817
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 vs 5817 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1118 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13735 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72849 | 55413 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5817 | 7241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3385.355 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.913 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1030.098 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 15 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 132 | 286 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
| Price now | $439.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1771 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3328 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 167 mm, 6.6 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 10 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
AMDFireStream 9370
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
IntelArc Pro A60
