NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
- 96.7x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 1,290 GTexel/s
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 450 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 240.964 vs 178.756
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 1,290 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 450 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 vs 178.756 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 4x more core clock speed: 2235 MHz vs 562 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 2520 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 4.9x more pipelines: 16384 vs 3328
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1297 vs 1110
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 38287 vs 13725
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 317791 vs 72896
- Around 59% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9223 vs 5815
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 582.642 vs 207.704
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 98.472 vs 22.913
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2968.159 vs 1030.098
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 vs 23 Nov 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 2235 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2520 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 16384 vs 3328 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1297 vs 1110 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 38287 vs 13725 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 317791 vs 72896 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9223 vs 5815 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 582.642 vs 207.704 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 98.472 vs 22.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2968.159 vs 1030.098 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1110 | 1297 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13725 | 38287 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72896 | 317791 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5815 | 9223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 | 582.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3385.355 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.913 | 98.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 | 178.756 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1030.098 | 2968.159 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Code name | GA106 | AD102 |
| Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 20 Sep 2022 |
| Place in performance rating | 114 | 13 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 2235 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1,290 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3328 | 16384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | 443.5 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 1,290 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | 76300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Triple-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 167 mm, 6.6 inches | 304 mm, 12 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 850 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
| Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | 137 mm, 5.4 inches |
| Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 1,008 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |

